On Jul 7, 2020, at 12:57, Havard Eidnes <he=40uninett...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's >>> good we're talking about it. ... >> >> by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were >> trying to get at with >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize/ >> >> but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven >> years (2003 to 2014) we gave it up. there are probably some >> good ideas in there, even now. > > I've read it, and most of it makes perfect sense to me (I think I > have one paragraph I'd like to discuss). > > When you say it was like "moving mud with a toothpick", was there > any active opposition to the draft, or was it just a lack of > engagement? I think there was a general lack of interest. I still think this is a good document and would be happy to continue working on it if the pendulum has swung the other way. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
