If the new draft of priming exchange considers and makes clarification on
the setting of a local resolver like rfc7706, then +1.

Davey

On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 07:40, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. Since RFC 8109 has been published, there has been more
> discussion of what DNS priming means. This has caused the document authors
> to see a few places where RFC 8109 could be clarified and improved. Please
> see:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klh-dnsop-rfc8109bis/
>
> Comments are welcome. If the WG wants to adopt this work, that would be
> grand as well.
>
> --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to