On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Vladimír Čunát wrote:

On 6/17/20 8:30 AM, Mats Dufberg wrote:
            I wonder if there is a way to extend 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml

to add signing/validation recommendations.  This seems "hard" from the world of 
IANA, but I'm not an expert.

We did the same at IPsec, where we are instructing IANA to do something
similar:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard-04#section-6

   This document instructs IANA to mark all IKEv1 registries as
   DEPRECATED.

   Additionally, this document instructs IANA to add an additional
   Status column to the IKEv2 Transform Type registries and mark the
   following entries as DEPRECATED:

   [...]

What strikes me is that IANA has no reference to RFC 8624 and that IANA still 
seems to consider SHA-1 and GOST to be algorithms
to be used.

Technically, IANA does not "consider" anything. They just assign
numbers. I agree it is helpful to list more information to the latest
relevant RFCs in the IANA section though. But the text from 8624
does not map cleanly into the existing registry.

We have had a similar discussion in IPsec on how much we want to be
in the RFC and how much we want to have in the IANA registry. People
have different views.

According to that last RFC, GOST in particular MAY be supported in validators, but there 
are others.  Maybe the "Zone Signing" column
in the registry is not meant to represent whether an algorithm has been obsoleted but 
just the purpose?  Or did "we forget" to add
IANA section into that RFC?  (I'm no good around these process-related 
knowledge.)

I think it refers to the DNSKEY flag, but I admit I find the colum for
Zone Signing and "Trans. Sec." confusing - but I'm not a DNS
implementer.

In any case, it would be nice from my perspective if the table could contain... 
basically the table from the RFC.

It is something we should discuss for the 8624bis document.

Paul

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to