On 12. 06. 20 17:12, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > All, > > As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run > regular calls for adoptions over the next few months. We are looking for > *explicit* support for adoption. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-arends-private-use-tld > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 26 June 2020
I support adoption but share opinion that the document should not be published as is. Rationale: - People are going to squat on global DNS no matter what IETF does. - This document is an opportunity to: a) Say "squating is a bad idea, see RFC 8244 and think it through" before you decide to squat. b) Highlight _already reserved_ (by ISO) TLD strings for people who ignored warning in point [a] above. c) I believe that side-effect of getting people _who insist on private TLD anyway_ one of 40-something strings instead of "pick your not-really-random-TLD" can lead to decrassing traffic to root and easier monitoring in practice as caching should work better (either with query name minimization or aggressive use of cache). -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
