> From: Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> > On 27. 05. 20 1:05, Paul Vixie wrote: >> than one kind of data in a single upstream DNS round trip. QDCOUNT>1 is not >> well defined and is broadly unimplemented. various other multiple-questions >> proposals have been made but nothing gets traction. > > I would much rather spent time on > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-03
I don't like new protocol and big change like QDCOUNT>1. Please check "dig +dnssec +norec @ns0.amsl.com ietf.org mx" and "dig +dnssec +norec @ams.sns-pb.isc.org. _sip._udp.isc.org srv". ietf.org authoritative servers add "mail.ietf.org A" in additiona section (with RRSIG). isc.org authoritative servers add "asterisk.isc.org A" in additional section (with RRSIG). Authoritative servers can add any A/AAAA RRs related to HTTPSSVC in additional section. Then, adding new text that "authoritative servers MAY add A/AAAA RRs related to HTTPSSVC RR in additional section". Recent resolvers reject/accept additional section data. (If they have RRSIGs, then they may be accepted). -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
