Hi

the Call for Adoption for this draft has completed, and there is strong
consensus for DNSOP to work on this.

Note:  During the Call, a very valid point was raised whether this document
should be Standards Track or not.
The chairs don't worry what are on the documents before adoption, as we
have faith that the working group
will help provide the correct guidance.  The authors are okay with
adjusting RFC status.

The chairs have been thinking about RFC status (real or imagined) of all
adopted work.  We do worry
about the effect all our work has on the Camel.

Thanks for your feedback.

tim



On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:41 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> All,
>
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
> regular call for adoptions over next few months.
> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends: 25 May 2020
>
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to