George Kuo who is not subscribed to the list said this: >Thanks all for sharing. >I have learned from all your input. > >George Kuo.
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:11 PM George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > > Thank you all for the responses. This has been very interesting. Paul > actually hinted this was the probable direction, and I think we can > say categorically the dictionary doesn't need updating because there > isn't a sense this concept needs defining in this context within this > WG. > > Many thanks > > -George (not Kuo. Btw, there are five georges at APNIC. hash > collisions happen all the time) > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:02 PM Davey Song <songlinj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > IMHO, public DNS is not a technical jargon which needs a DNS terminology > > RFC to record (it collects all DNS definition and terms from other DNS RFC). > > > > The term "Public DNS" or "Public DNS service" belongs to the scope of how > > people provide and operate DNS services to their best interests. There are > > many similar terms, such as Cloud DNS, Dynamic DNS, DNS firewall, and > > many DNS-attacking terms. BTW, I'm happy to see there is a document to > > define all DNS attacks and mitigation suggestions. > > > > Best regards， > > Davey > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 08:56, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > >> > >> My Colleague George Kuo asked me for definitions of public DNS > >> service. not "public DNS" but the trigram "public DNS service" > >> > >> Colloquially we understand this reasonably well. It is in the space of > >> what Google, quad9, CloudFlare and others do. The various clean DNS > >> feeds people subscribe to, it is the functional role of a recursive, > >> but to the public, yet somehow not the bad one of an open DNS resolver > >> being abused to do DDoS: its the conscious service offering of a > >> recursive/cache/forwarder in the public view, a declared intent. > >> > >> A Google search lists (some of) them by name and IP. > >> > >> I asked "Dr Johnson" (Paul Hoffman) why it was not in his dictionary, > >> and he said he is but the humble scribe, and words appear in the > >> dictionary when he is directed. > >> > >> What does the WG feel? The definitions of the "elements" of a public > >> DNS service are of course defined. But not (I feel) the "collected > >> whole" which most definitely exists, out there. > >> > >> (if anyone feels this is adequately defined, please correct me and share a > >> URL) > >> > >> -George > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> DNSOP mailing list > >> DNSOP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
