A bit of a late input, because well,.. the known. For most of the software stack of NLnet Labs, the update timeout isn't too relevant, as dynamic updates aren't there. Dynamic updates, and thus the timeout would be most relevant to OpenDNSSEC, and dynamic updates are on the list. But I tend to agree to consider this feature pull driven. I'm not sure how effective this feature is without clear user want. Since explicit adoption means, in my book, to implement this shortly as well, I rather wait on the above.
BR, \Berry _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
