yes. well finessed! keep the SHOULD relax the non-normative language is fine.
and I understand not wanting to work on this regarding TTL and meaning against RR. as I said, support adoption. this is good work. its implemented. -G On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:07 PM Willem Toorop <wil...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > Op 12-05-2020 om 00:48 schreef George Michaelson: > > I support adoption. > > > > I wondered a little about "it is absolutely essential for these > > transfers to be protected from unexpected modifications on the route. > > So, catalog zone transfers SHOULD be authenticated using TSIG > > [RFC2845]." > > > > The use of a categorical *absolutely* and SHOULD is jarring. If this > > is really categorical, the normative enforcement needs to be stronger > > maybe? > > Agree, how about replacing "it is absolutely essential" with "it is key"? > > > I also wondered why the TTL of the RR is not held to be meaningful. It > > felt like there is an opportunity to use this field but thats quibble, > > the document as-is defines it as 0 and thats ok, if perhaps missing an > > opportunity to use a field close to the zone being catalogued for some > > purpose. > > We're staying away from actual configuration properties in this draft on > purpose. TTL could be used to mean something in the dynamics of adding > & removing of zones itself, but it feels a bit fragile to do that to be > honest - we might exclude (or make more difficult) certain setups where > the catalog could not be used by or from the authoritative nameserver > directly. > > -- Willem > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:42 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> All, > >> > >> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run > >> regular call for adoptions over next few months. > >> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption. > >> > >> > >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones > >> > >> The draft is available here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ > >> > >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > >> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > >> > >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > >> > >> This call for adoption ends: 25 May 2020 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> tim wicinski > >> DNSOP co-chair > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> DNSOP mailing list > >> DNSOP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
