Hi Joe, Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958. The current draft mentions that TA should be associated with bootstrapping mechanism and that boostrapping for the root zone should be extended to other TA.
There are clearly some overlap between the two drafts and I also have the impression the drafts can be merged. the following issue has been opened: https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/issues/7 Yours, Daniel On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:17 PM Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > On 4 May 2020, at 15:08, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for > draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements > > > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/ > > > > > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > I have not looked at this draft far beyond the table of contents, but it > strikes me that this is very similar to an earlier draft that I recall > failing to persuade the working group to adopt: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jabley-dnsop-validator-bootstrap-00 > > If there is new-found enthusiasm for documenting these kinds of things > then I am overjoyed. Perhaps there is an opportunity to merge that existing > work from 2011 with this effort. > > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
