On Tuesday, 28 April 2020 21:57:16 UTC John Levine wrote: > In article <6.2.5.6.2.20200428121847.081a2...@elandnews.com> you write: > >I found a WG draft (expired) from 2017 about RPZ. I am not sure why > >it stalled in DNSOP. There is also a 2018 draft (expired). I > >vaguely recall looking at a draft. However, proposed changes were > >not accepted. > > One problem is that the last time I looked at it, the draft needed a > great deal of editing and reorganization to be accessible to people > who don't already know all about RPZ. The other is the question of > documenting something that definitely exists and is implemented but > has some arguable technical flaws.
the situation at present is, i got way more feedback from reviewers than i anticipated, lost heart, and got stuck. it's in the independent editor queue, having been determined as non-competitive to any WG's current activity. i'm home for the pandemic, so let me pump out an updated draft which will hopefully get quick review by the rest of you home for the pandemic. whatever technical flaws it may have can be enumerated (if there's consensus) but not fixed in this draft. we're going to document what exists, so that the community can then take it in hand and determine what it becomes. -- Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
