On Apr 15, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > > Since this is a one line RFC change of an erroneous omission of text , could > it be done as an errata instead?
No. It is not an error in the spec that someone noticed 30 years later: it is an operational observation followed by implementation requirement. > How widespread is this broken behaviour ? Enough for this clarification to be needed. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
