Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My lack of domain knowledge made this document hard for me to understand, but given that this document as aimed at folks deploying DNS servers I don't really see that as a problem. One note is that the draft does use quite a few acronyms and has no terminology section. I'm not suggesting adding a terminology section but perhaps in the introduction it would be worth adding a sentence to point readers to RFC 8499/BCP 219? This should probably also be listed as an informative dependency (assuming that the terms used are formally defined elsewhere). _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
