Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a bunch of nits here: Section 3: Nits: * "... a certain amount of delay. Or that downstream ..." -- s/. O/, o/ * "Details of how the DNSKEY RRset itself is validated differs." -- s/differs/differ/ Section 5: Nits: * "Authentiated denial of existence ..." -- s/Authentiated/Authenticated/ Section 5.2: Nits: * "... different authentiated denial methods ..." -- s/authentiated/authenticated/ * "Resolver software may be however designed ..." -- s/may be however/may, however, be/ (or equivalent) * "... more optimally than permanent setup ..." -- perhaps "more optimally than a permanent setup"? * "... for a matching authentiated denial ..." -- s/authentiated/authenticated/ Section 7: Nits: * " A Combined Signing Key (CSK), is one ..." -- s/,// * "i.e." should be "i.e.," * "In this case, any or all the providers could employ ..." -- s/all/all of/ * "... of all the other providers" -- s/all/all of/ Section 9: Nits: * "... with each others zone signing ..." -- s/others/other's/, and again later in the same sentence _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
