I originally sent this to the list last July. Olafur provided some feedback 
(which has been incorporated into the text suggested below), but it seems to 
have slipped past the document editors. Trying again since the document has 
been revived after it recently expired...

I've recently been reading draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis and I'd like to propose 
some additional text for the Security Considerations section in the spirit of 
this sentence from the abstract:

"Future versions of this draft will contain descriptions of different 
minimisation implementation choices that have been made since the RFC 7816 
first came out, as well as deployment experience."

QNAME minimization has the consequence of reduction in the amount of 
information seen by authoritative name server operators. Active consideration 
of that consequence is worth capturing as a factor to be weighed when making 
the choice to implement QNAME minimization. Here's suggested text:

"In addition to the performance considerations described in Section 4, there's 
also a security consideration associated with the reduction of  data sent to 
parental name servers: they lose some of their ability to assess security 
threats.  This ability  has proven to be useful in, for example, studies of 
name collision vulnerabilities.  It was also instrumental in the research that 
led to the discovery of the JASBUG vulnerability. The reduction will also have 
an impact on the level of detail available for research studies such as 
DNS-OARC's annual Day in the Life of the Internet (DITL) data collection 
exercise.

For this reason, operators should consider the potential impact on threat 
analysis and research when reducing the level of detail included in queries to 
parental name servers. Without such consideration, a collection of individual 
decisions to reduce query information, over time, may well have the unintended 
consequence of "deciding" to no longer support threat analysis and research 
that the operational DNS community has historically relied on.  Alternative 
mechanisms for facilitating threat analysis and research are beyond the scope 
of this document."

Scott

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to