tmorizot> I would also like to understand why global and unique names tmorizot> are unacceptable. Why do folks insist on NAT and RFC 1918? or ULA v6? There is a common feeling that it's another layer of security. I personally am not a fan of it but I think this is probably the most critical thing to have in the draft/RFC, i.e. pointing out that using globally unique names is way cleaner and outlining the issues not doing that will force you to deal with.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
