Hi Duane. On 20:49 27/01, Wessels, Duane wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > I like this proposal and think that DNSOP should adopt it. I agree that it > will prove valuable in debugging. >
Great. > A couple of comments and suggestions: > > Sections 2 and 3 could be clarified regarding the value for OPTION-LENGTH. I > gather the intention is that OPTION-LENGTH is zero for queries and 4 for > responses. > Yes, that's the intention. I'll make it explicit in section 2. > The "MUST" in section 3.2 feels too strong to me, absent any other text that > says this feature is optional to implement or support. Maybe include some > text similar to whats in RFC 5001. e.g., "A name server that understands the > RRSERIAL option and chooses to honor a particular RRSERIAL request responds > by ..." > You're right, it'll be an optional/experimental feature. I'll modify the text in this sense. Thanks a lot! Hugo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
