On 12/23/19 9:22 PM, Eric Orth wrote: > 2) Any chain limiting enforcement only applies to stubs following > chains, not recursives. > > Recursives are already following CNAMEs without a standardized limit. > [...]
(I'm a bit late, I'm sorry.) Recursives *in practice* seem quite limited. Unbound has limit of 10, for BIND it's less than 20, I think. OK, for SVCB the suggested limits so far were lower than 10 (or unspecified/unlimited). This is one of the cases where it seems quite difficult to agree to standardize a particular number, even though "unlimited" doesn't make any sense, and we end up in a fuzzy state where no particular guarantees get standardized (or followed). --Vladimir _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
