On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 1:01 PM Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > On Friday, 3 January 2020 20:01:04 UTC Erik Kline wrote: > > I think removing port number flexibility might unduly constrain some data > > center use cases where service reachability might not have the more > common > > 443-only limitations. > > "think" and "might" are unpersuasive, and "unduly" is subjective. however, > i'll explain further on the other mailing list that the HTTPSSVC co-chair > directed me to. >
It means it would prevent using other ports inside the datacenter. The WG should not make this change. Additionally, I am not sure what a "managed private network" is, since the term seems to imply a lack of privacy. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
