On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:00:39PM -0800, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote a message of 53 lines which said:
> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'A Common Operational Problem > in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> as Best Current Practice I just tested the dig commands against NSD and Knot. No problem for NSD but Knot has a discrepancy: 8.1.4 "Testing Unknown Opcodes" expect: status: NOTIMP But: % dig +noedns +noad +opcode=15 +norec +header-only @2001:678:f::1 ; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.11-Ubuntu <<>> +noedns +noad +opcode=15 +norec +header-only @2001:678:f::1 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: RESERVED15, status: FORMERR, id: 58770 ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 0, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; Query time: 24 msec ;; SERVER: 2001:678:f::1#53(2001:678:f::1) ;; WHEN: Mon Dec 16 10:28:49 CET 2019 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 12 Do we agree that Knot is wrong and the draft is right? Or is FORMERR acceptable? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
