On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a > > consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft? > > Is it useful as it is? > > I expect almost no-one can do anything with EDE without > getaddrinfo() EAI_ return code extensions.
At a minimum dig should be able to support it. Does any of the dig variants have support for EDE yet? > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ > Plymouth: Variable 4 or less. Smooth or slight, occasionally moderate later in > west. Mainly fair. Good._______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
