神明達哉 <jin...@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
>
> Anyway, my interpretation of the responses so far (or the lack of
> thereof) is that no one knows (or cares about) the exact range (per
> protocol standard) for these parameters. That's not the best result I
> wished to see, but at least it looks like I didn't miss anything
> obvious for others.
I would be inclined to treat them like TTL values and follow section 8 of
RFC 2181, but as Mark said, the signedness doesn't affect the behaviour
since you'll be clamping the values between something like a few minutes
and a few weeks.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Portland, Plymouth: Northeast 3 or 4, becoming variable 3 or less later.
Smooth or slight, occasionally moderate at first in west Plymouth. Showers.
Good.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
