On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
My suggestion was a link the proper IANA registries, which _are_ updated
by other RFCs to place things into obsolete/deprecated and receive new
entries based on other new RFCs.
As you said the implementors need to go to the IANA/YANG module place, a
link to that would be more useful than including a current snapshot of
the IANA registries.
I agree but, unfortunately, any proper solution might take quite some time. As
a temporary solution, would it be possible to continue with the current draft
(in DNSOP WG or elsewhere) provided that it will be emphasized that the RFC is
intended primarily for IANA, and that implementors should look for the module
at the IANA page?
Let's see what the IESG has to say on this, as they have been working on
this issue.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
