On 9/30/19 7:09 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> writes: > >> Saying "SHOULD NOT" without helping the reading understand the >> implications is dangerous and will lead to lack of >> interoperability. Either this document specifies the exact places >> where an EDE can change the processing of the RCODE, or the current >> MUST NOT wording is correct. > > Did you read the new replacement sentence? > > Applications MUST continue to follow requirements from applicable > specs on how to process RCODEs no matter what EDE values is also > received. > > Is that sufficient?
Yes, thank you. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
