I support this. DLV was a mistake and making it historic should close that door.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:42 PM The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Moving DNSSEC Lookaside > Validation (DLV) to Historic Status' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt> as Informational RFC > > Please note that this is primarily to support: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-dlv-to-historic > and should be read with that. > > We are using option 2 of > > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/designating-rfcs-historic-2014-07-20/ > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2019-09-18. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document obsoletes DNSSEC lookaside validation (DLV) and > reclassifies RFCs 4431 and 5074 as Historic. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
