On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:23 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All > > Sorry for the delay, the IETF moves very few RFCs to Historic > (thats' another discussion), but all looks like ready to move forward >
Indeed. This document looks good to me, but for process wonkery reasons it needs to be WGLC'ed and then sent to me so I can attach a "status-change" note and then progress it. Thanks to the authors and WG for this, and sorry for the annoyance. W > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ > > The Current Intended Status of this document is moving these to Historic > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. > If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. > If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak > out with your reasons. > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: 3 > September 2019 > > thanks > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
