On Jul 9, 2019, at 20:11, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > everything other than HTTPS can just use SRV. > > ANAME is (should be) toast(ed).
Didn't we get to this point by acknowledging that there was a gap between now and the glorious future where SRV and unnamed alternatives for HTTPS, and that the gap was already being filled by multiple, different, ANAME-looking things? The point of ANAME was to give us some multi-provider/Interop options while the trucks roll, I thought. They are not fast trucks. It has taken 23 years to get from RFC 2052 to here. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
