On Jul 9, 2019, at 20:11, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:

> everything other than HTTPS can just use SRV.
>
> ANAME is (should be) toast(ed).

Didn't we get to this point by acknowledging that there was a gap
between now and the glorious future where SRV and unnamed alternatives
for HTTPS, and that the gap was already being filled by multiple,
different, ANAME-looking things?

The point of ANAME was to give us some multi-provider/Interop options
while the trucks roll, I thought. They are not fast trucks. It has
taken 23 years to get from RFC 2052 to here.


Joe

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to