+1 to all of that which follows! > On 2 Jul 2019, at 14:41, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > >> So ISC plans to deprecate the feature in BIND 9. But also I think it is >> time to move the protocol to Historic status as a clear signal to >> everyone that it should no longer be implemented or deployed. > > I agree with moving DLV to historic. It is no longer needed at large, > and while it can serve a few corner cases, the only public DLV registry > has been deactivated years ago, and DLV is not universally implemented > to begin with, so one could not depend on a new to be launched DLV registry > anyways. > > The draft seems to explain it well. > >> Title: Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ > > "As of May 2019, the root zone is signed" > > While it is correct that in May 2019, the root zone is signed, I don't > think that's the information you are trying to relay :) :) :) > > > 3.1.1.2. I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang > > The draft "YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record Types" > [I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang] refers to RFC 4431 to > describe the DLV entry in the YANG module iana-dns-class-rr-type. > This reference should be removed. > > I think this does not need to be in this document, but the authors > should be requested to remove it in an update to their document. > In general, yang documents should not populate IANA registries, which > is something I raised afew months ago and the yang community is looking > at that. (and reference IANA registries instead) > > And I think Ondřej should fix up his name :) > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
