On Jun 11, 2019, at 20:04, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote:

> MHO, the ANAME is the real answer we're sending; the A and AAAA records
> are just friendly hand-holding for legacy servers.  It doesn't make sense
> to me to demote the real answer into the additional section, any more than
> it would have to move DNAME there. The protocol specificaions are clear on
> this point - the more so considering we've already deployed DNAME - and my
> sympathies for an implementation that got it wrong would be limited.

I think DNAME provides a useful example. I think emulating DNAME's
demonstrated success in both being tolerated and interpreted correctly
is useful.


Joe

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to