On Jun 11, 2019, at 20:04, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > MHO, the ANAME is the real answer we're sending; the A and AAAA records > are just friendly hand-holding for legacy servers. It doesn't make sense > to me to demote the real answer into the additional section, any more than > it would have to move DNAME there. The protocol specificaions are clear on > this point - the more so considering we've already deployed DNAME - and my > sympathies for an implementation that got it wrong would be limited.
I think DNAME provides a useful example. I think emulating DNAME's demonstrated success in both being tolerated and interpreted correctly is useful. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop