Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please respond to the Gen-ART review. In line with Mirja's comment, if the WG or someone in it were planning on maintaining the 4.1 comparison table somewhere less stable than an RFC, that seems like it could be useful and could be linked to from the WG datatracker page. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
