On Mar 24, 2019, at 11:18 AM, bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote: > It may be good to add a note that "DoH is the protocol as defined in > [RFC8484]. The operation of this protocol by browser vendors and cloud > providers is frequently also called 'DoH'. DoH-the-protocol is > therefore frequently conflated with DoH being used to perform > DNS lookups in a different fashion than configured by the network settings > (see DaT and DaO)."
A much better outcome would be that people who are saying DoH when they mean DaT or DaO would use the new terms. That is, this is a forward-looking document because we're making up new terms. > Secondly, I understand the technical need for the wording of the definition > of DaO. But I had to read this all a few times before I understood that > 'DaO' includes what I've referred to as DoC (DNS over Cloud). I think > definitions should be easy to understand because otherwise they don't > function. I fully agree; proposed changes to this wording are quite welcome. It's a new term, after all. > I'm also not too hot for conflating "user consciously changes > /etc/resolv.conf or equivalent" with "application makes the choice for the > user". The split here is more "someone changes from traditional without the user knowing, when the user cares". If you have a better way to express that, that would be great. > Perhaps we should talk about 'Per-application stubs'? Because this is the > nub. Maybe, but I'm hesitant to make the break that way because some applications' stubs use the traditional resolver, others don't. I would be hesitant to conflate those two. > I'm willing to write text once we have discussed this a bit. Thanks! --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
