> On Mar 21, 2019, at 11:29 PM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I realize, expressiveness adds complexity. However, it does avoid assumptions 
> and overloading.
> 
> The main criteria is agreement on client vs server (i.e. standardize this 
> stuff), and possibly also add the network as another party involved (for 
> upstream transit ISP vs local ISP), if they have differing policies for 
> allowing offsite/third-party DoH or DoT.

So my thoughts on this real quick: one of the reasons many people are using 
centralized services like 8.8.8.8 (for example) is its complex to run these 
servers properly. 

I’m worried about this additional complexity breaking the camels back, or 
deployment being relegated to those of us that may have overly complex home 
networks. 

The options and matrix add in complexity when a simple approach is likely 
desired or needed. 

The small networks that do not run their own servers won’t change. The medium 
where it’s on the bubble will further centralize. Is this what is needed in the 
community?

- Jared 



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to