Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2019, at 15:53, Martin Hoffmann <mar...@opennetlabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > As such, I would like to propose to move HMAC-MD5 to optional and only
> > retain SHA-1 and SHA-256 as mandatory.
> It’s too soon. Only a year or so again there was only hmac-md5
I don't understand that comment ...
4635 HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm)
TSIG Algorithm Identifiers. D. Eastlake 3rd. August 2006. (Format:
TXT=16533 bytes) (Updates RFC2845) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) (DOI:
10.17487/RFC4635)
BIND got support in 9.5.0.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: West 7 to severe gale 9, decreasing 6,
then becoming cyclonic later. Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough at
first in Forties and Dogger. Showers, rain later. Good, occasionally poor._______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
