On Wednesday, 13 March 2019 02:33:14 UTC Kenji Baheux wrote: > *(Sincere apologies about the multi-posting but the discussion seems to be > happening in different places...)* > > > Hi, > > I'm involved with Chrome's DoH efforts. > > ... > > PS: I won't be able to join IETF 104 to discuss this face to face, but I > will see if someone from our side can represent us.
thank you for this information. can i request that you offer DoT as a solution, not just DoH? they offer the same capabilities of secrecy and authenticity, but DoT can be cheaply disabled by the network operator, whereas a malicious user or app using DoH will be very expensive to detect or prevent at the network level. vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
