On Mar 4, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Ray Bellis <r...@isc.org> wrote: >> This new draft describes a way for clients and servers to exchange a limited >> amount of information where the semantics of that information are completely >> unspecified, and therefore determined by bi-lateral agreement between the >> client and server operators. > > Any reason not to use DNS Stateful Operations for this?
Yes: the DNS state specification is necessarily complicated to implement because it is doing much more than what is proposed here. It is OK for someone to propose a simple mechanism for a simple need. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
