> Il 12 febbraio 2019 alle 22.00 Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> ha scritto: > > What I am trying to point out is that the situation with DoH is a symptom of > the problem you are not talking about, not the only instance of it. > You seem to be asserting that DoH is special among all other misuses of port > 443. But you haven’t explained why it is special. This is what I was > trying to tease out with my initial response to what you said.
Well, DoH has a couple of very special features: - it affects name resolution, which is the initial step for almost everything you do over the Internet; - apparently, it will be deployed by default to the entire mankind or so. It is quite different than some smart users or some specific applications using HTTPS (or VPNs) to bypass the local network operator and/or the local jurisdiction. In technical terms it might not be different, but in business, policy and political terms this makes all the difference. Ciao, -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
