> On 21 Nov 2018, at 03:24, Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote: > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I support Benjamin's DISCUSS point about privacy considerations. > > ยง2: Is there a reason not to use the boilerplate from RFC 8174? There are a > number of lower case instances of normative keywords. These are ambiguous > under > the RFC 2119 boilerplate.
Nope - will fix. Thanks Sara. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
