On Nov 8, 2018, at 9:38 AM, p vixie <p...@redbarn.org>; wrote:
If additional data is optional, so most resolvers can just pass it
through, the DNS techs will say yes but the HTTP techs will say
no.
We have a bad track record of predicting what other groups will want
from the DNS or use it for. Specifying what "HTTP techs" will say
seems premature before a fully-fleshed proposal is taken to them.
are you thinking i made that part up?
did you not notice when they rejected SRV for two decades, or what
reason they gave?
(hint: "i solved the wildcard problem you weren't worried about, but the
browser will still have to ask two questions on first reference, to get
the cache populated, and additional data will only be included if the
resolver has been upgraded to recognize this type code"... will not
change the answer they gave to SRV.)
feels a bit like ground-hog day in here.
--
P Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
