On 30 Oct 2018, at 12:57, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: >> With IANA registry requests, I may be wrong here, but I thought we had >> some (boilerplate?) language about how IANA is asked to operate the >> registry: what criteria judge acceptance. Is it like the OID and >> basically open (hair oil) slather, or is it only at WG RFC documented >> request? > > If there is a better template, we'd certainly like to hear it.
RFC 8126 contains exactly the guidance you're looking for. When creating a new registry you not only need to specify the schema and the initial rows to populate the new table with (as you started in section 5.2, although the formatting of the table is a bit horrifying); you also need to specify the name of the registry, required information for future additions and the registration policy. Happy to contribute some text if that seems useful. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
