Hi folks, I put the thought of IPv6 GeoIP in an draft. I think it more related to dnsop wg. Hope you like it.
Best regards, Davey ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 02:46 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs-00.txt To: Weijian Liao <jewfor...@gmail.com>, Linjian Song <songlinj...@gmail.com> A new version of I-D, draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Linjian Song and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs Revision: 00 Title: Client Dualstack Subnets in DNS Queries Document date: 2018-10-22 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 6 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-song-dnsop-dualstack-ecs Abstract: During the period of IPv6 transition, IP-based Geolocation (GeoIP) applications are identified as a challenge and speed bump for ICPs (Internet Content Providers) to migrating their service to IPv6. Some studies and operational experiences show that the accuracy of IPv6 GeoIP is relatively poor in comparison to their IPv4 counterparts. This memo proposed to include client's dualstack subnets into DNS queries to provide better IPv6 GeoIP. REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION: The source of the document with test script is currently placed at GitHub [Dualstack-ECS-GitHub]. Comments and pull request are welcome. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
