Hi Loganaden, while I understand what you are asking for, I don’t understand how it would improve the document.
IETF RFCs are static and if we include any current “numbers” they quickly become invalid. Adding figures to the document doesn’t improve readability or the content. While it would support the claims we make in the document I feel that the consensus process IETF have is just fine for giving the content enough validity, and we don’t have to support every claim we make in the document with figures. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ond...@isc.org > On 2 Oct 2018, at 15:40, Loganaden Velvindron <logana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the >> document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC. >> >> >> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update >> >> Current versions of the draft is available here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ >> > > Section 3.1. > > " > RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 are widely deployed, although zones > deploying it are recommended to switch to ECDSAP256SHA256 as there is > an industry-wide trend to move to elliptic curve cryptography. > " > > And also this paragraph: > " > > RSASHA256 is in wide use and considered strong. > > " > > My suggestion would be to include figures or at minimum a reference. > There is a document from ISOC with 3 tables where there is an analysis > of deployment DNSSEC worldwide. > > https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ISOC-State-of-DNSSEC-Deployment-2016-v1.pdf, > Page 23 & Page 24. > > >> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed Standard >> >> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. >> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. >> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak >> out with your reasons. >> >> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: 16 >> October 2018 >> >> thanks >> tim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
