On Sep 20, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Mukund Sivaraman <m...@mukund.org<mailto:m...@mukund.org>> wrote:
SRV is most elegant. IMO we should push the resolver-side CNAME handling change through so one day in the future it is available widely. +1 I do think this is a path we need to go. We need *something* like CNAME at the apex. Either CNAME itself or something that works in the same way but might have a different name. Otherwise, those of us out there publishing sites using CDNs but wanting to use an apex domain name are stuck using whatever proprietary options DNS operator X is offering us… which will be different from DNS operators Y and Z. This locks us in to a specific DNS operator. (Who may or may not also be the CDN operator.) Given the long deployment timeline, I do think we need to start on this sooner. I’m glad to help. My 2 cents, Dan -- Dan York Director, Content & Web Strategy, Internet Society y...@isoc.org<mailto:y...@isoc.org> +1-802-735-1624 Jabber: y...@jabber.isoc.org<mailto:y...@jabber.isoc.org> Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork http://www.internetsociety.org/
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
