_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
this proposal appears to make more sense. if cname cannot be used until
everybody has upgraded, then some other ?name RR could be used instead,
on a similar time line, and would have no impact on those who never
upgraded.
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and... Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and stan... Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and stan... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and... Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME a... Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CN... Anthony Eden
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME a... Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME a... Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CN... Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CN... Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizin... Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standard... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and stan... Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CN... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizin... Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standard... Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and stan... Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and... Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME... Mukund Sivaraman