Dear DNSOP WG, In response to some IESG ballot comments the authors of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signaling made some changes; IMO the new version is much more readable.
It looks like a lot of changes, but they fall into two categories: a bunch of section moves, where stuff that was not central to the protocol flow was moved later in the document, some reorganization for clarity, and some terminology changes for consistency and clarity. There are no technical changes to the document. These changes were all motivated by the questions the ADs asked during review, and make the document clearer in ways that will prevent a future reader from stumbling over the same issues. The changes all look good to me; I'm planning on approving them, but because reorganization makes the changes look large I want to give the WG a chance to provide feedback -- please let me know by Sept 19th (1 week) if you have any major issue with the reorganization. Note: This isn't reopening IETF (or WG) LC, it is limited to just the reorganization / terminology changes. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
