On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:48 AM Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > <clip> > Section 4.4 > > Why are we enumerating transports instead of talking about the properties > they provide? We've got multiple new transports in the works, and it would > be a shame to ignore them out of the gate. > It's probably also worth pointing out (chiming in on Benjamin's ballot) that talking about transport properties would help us make sure we keep those properties in mind when we work on new transports :-) ... Spencer
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
