On 31 Aug 2018, at 14:47, Adam Roach wrote:
§5:
Owner: The domain name where a RR is found ([RFC1034], Section
3.6).
Nit: "...an RR..." (see RFC 7322 §1, CMOS 10.9)
There too.
In that case, this definition appears to be missing quotation marks.
Good point. Added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
§6:
Privacy-enabling DNS server: "A DNS server that implements DNS
over
TLS [RFC7858] and may optionally implement DNS over DTLS
[RFC8094]." (Quoted from [RFC8310], Section 2)
This definition seems incomplete in light of the mechanism defined
in
draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https.
Agree, but it is what we have as a quotation.
Other definitions consist of quotations plus additional information
(frequently in the form of another quotation). If the notion here is
that you don't want to perform any synthesis, I'm sympathetic to that
(although other definitions do contain substantial synthesis, so it
doesn't seem like a hard-and-fast rule). If that's not the rationale,
consider adding explanatory text pointing to DoH. I'm not really
bothered either way, though. As Spencer is fond of saying: do the
right thing.
Another good point. Added as well.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
