That's understandable. I think it would be most helpful to somehow tag those cases so that the reader can see that they are ambiguous rather than just rereading and being confused.
-Ekr On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > Ekr pinged me in Jabber after I sent this, and I wanted to clarify > something bigger-picture on this document. We know that there are a number > of definitions that are not clear. In the WG discussion, we tried hard to > get them clarified, and often met resistance in the form of "I have always > thought it meant X" vs. "I have always thought it meant Y" that could not > be resolved. On some of the terms that Ekr asked for clarity on, we had > even done separate threads. In the end, there was reasonably strong WG > consensus that the document was the best we could do, even thought most of > the folks who said that probably had at least one bit that they didn't like > in the document. > > --Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
