On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote: > > Ted, Would it be acceptable to just do >> s/TCP/Connection oriented Transport/ >> > > For RFC 7901 we used "source-IP-verified transport" > > If this is the only characteristic that the working group believes will cause variance in ANY responses, then reusing this terminology seems fine. I suspect, however, that it is not the only characteristic that will in practice. I can easily imagine cases where ANY returns full answers when the transport is confidential and minimal ones when it is not. I have absolutely no data to back this intuition, though, so I will understand if the working group and authors disagree. regards, Ted Hardie > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
