It would probably be easier to get internal.arpa, similar to home.arpa. You could use home.arpa now, but it would look a little funny... :)
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:52 AM, A. Schulze <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote: > Hello, > > some times ago there was an proposal (?) from Warren Kumari to define a > zone "internal." for internal use. > > We consider a major DNS redesign of a large enterprise network. Part of > the network is private (RFC1918 address space in use) > some other parts are public. The whole network is currently organized as > subdomains of example.com. > > One problem is the inability of users to distinguish the public/private > state of different subdomains. > sub1.example.com is public, sub2.example.com isn't :-/ > > For that I like the proposal to use "internal." But that's far away from > being a standard. > So I like to ask about alternatives... > > Thanks for suggestions > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
