[ Top-post ] Thank you to Ólafur and Dave for their comments -- I know that the discussion on the draft has been long and the draft is filled with minutia, but we'd dearly love more feedback, positive or negative.
W On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:42 PM Dave Lawrence <t...@dd.org> wrote: > > Warren Kumari writes: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:36 AM Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > > > > > The authors are more than happy to change the name to that... > > .... but we would really really appreciate more comments / review. > > I support publication as-is, existing title and all. It is a valuable > document about the operational considerations for which DNSSEC signers > really need better guidance. I do not think the title needs changing, > as it clearly says it is targeted at the publishing side. > > The "publication considered harmful" claim needs explanation as to the > harms that would be caused. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
